Effective learning requires time comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with example.
The importance of study and employment which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This easy will elaborate both aspects of this trend and this will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that working with studies is also right. Working with such studies, we can pay our collage fees. Apart from this, we can also spend our home. Another pivotal aspect for the argument is that by working with studies, we can fulfill our need. Needless to say that the all these merits stand study and employment in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate this argument which certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but the most alarming is that I think working with studies is wrong. Hence, it is apparent why many are against study and employment.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefit of study and employment are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, the potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wbacks should not be overlooked either.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, while, apart from, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 31.9359605911 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 1207.87684729 83% => OK
No of words: 196.0 242.827586207 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13265306122 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.92707691288 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6331869416 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602040816327 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 379.143842365 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1894633614 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4545454545 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15075200621 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634814665265 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044324004822 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960639099238 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270490774723 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.