The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do you think should be responsible for solving it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual?
Recently, the environmental damage has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "who is responsibleto solve environmental problems?". Whereas it is a widely held view that government is accountable to address environmental issues, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the protection of environment standpoint, environmental conservation are bound up inextricably with eco-friendly products, which indicates they lead to both endangered specious and industrial pollution. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between global warming and air pollution as well as an exponential increase in coastal erosion. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of environmental hazards is correlated positively with not only fossil fuel but also recycling procedures.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, environmental protection attribute to government, in that it would come down to individuals, companies, and organization. A salient example of such attribution is clean energy revolution, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take water pollution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint nuclear industry problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to natural sources, clean energy, and even renewable energy. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of environmental regulations.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes, "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that government and individuals are accountable to solve environmental problems. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ing goes, 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06028368794 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45845048171 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684397163121 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9215686067 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.461538462 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0788710812667 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0236396984812 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330371855411 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501530289553 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375715756538 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 11.5310837438 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.94827586207 176% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.