The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems.
Who do u think should be responsible to solve it? Is it governments, organisations or each individuals?
Numerous individuals believe that the Earth is already in its destructive condition because of the innumerable issues. In my perspective, it is the collective responsibility of the state by their legislatures, corporations for the community programs and discipline of each citizen to address environmental degradation. This essay will discuss my justifications for the stated reason.
To begin with, ecological imbalance has been experienced nowadays. This is an indirect result of the lack of regulations covering the protection of the mother nature. The government should take into account the policies and state direction targeting on environment conservation. Moreover, it also the duty of every industry to promote healthy surroundings by initiating programs that help solve the planet's detrimental state. To illustrate, mandatory policy implemented by the government on effluent river waters are strictly complied by the companies by ensuring that it is included in their internal programs on environment.
Apart from this, the contribution of any person to alleviate problems on biosphere cannot be ignored. Individuals can be a carriers of change through reduction in private vehicle dependence. They may used bike, public transport or even commute to lessen carbon emissions. For example, people these days are participating in advocacy for changing attitudes regarding environment by their involvement in walking or marathon activities that promotes cleaner atmosphere.
To recapitulate, solutions to environmental problems can be construed upon by the entire efforts of different sectors of the society. Indeed, everyone will benefit from these ecological undertakings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a carrier' or simply 'carriers'?
Suggestion: a carrier; carriers
...e cannot be ignored. Individuals can be a carriers of change through reduction in private ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, apart from, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9262295082 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.336528747 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668032786885 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4580373185 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941323886219 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275542661613 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284909645376 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0492711288003 0.151781067708 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149615069371 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 53.1260098522 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.