The environment we live in is in danger due to various global problems.
Recently, the phenomenon of environmental problems and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of creative environmental solutions is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that critical international concerns can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, different global problems can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of international dangers, as well as protecting the earth, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered important pollution sources. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both a natural environment and environmental hazards apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, environmental dangers might increase the consequences of deforestation. Moreover, fundamental aspects of global strategies would relate to this reality that the demerits of widespread concerns pertain to protecting jungles. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of destroying the environment is correlated negatively with harmful gas emissions. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of environmental pollution.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of living in the environment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of solving universal issues prove the significance of environmental protection, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94941634241 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47620892989 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657587548638 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1254524686 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.416666667 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0910186523492 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0288758459361 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321587522329 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.051239851103 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319309249157 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.23 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.