Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of medical technology and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of human's life expectancy is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that medical facilities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, medical improvement can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of social life quality, as well as medical inventions, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered new treatment methods. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both well-educated doctors and modern hospitals apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, facilitated hospitals might increase the consequences of traditional treatment. Moreover, fundamental aspects of electronic medical devices would relate to this reality that the demerits of improving technology pertain to an increase in life expectancy. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of an aging population is correlated negatively with finding new surgery methods. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of modern devices.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of new medical devices far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of humans' social satisfaction prove the significance of a healthy environment, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pensioners'' or 'pensioner's'?
Suggestion: pensioners'; pensioner's
...y has asserted that the downside of old pensioners happiness is correlated negatively with...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76153846154 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27998232063 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646153846154 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2809841304 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.833333333 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142068538434 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445899172531 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461024201927 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807269996073 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219434329738 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.