Eventually, electric cars will solve all of our transport and environmental issues.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of electric cars with regards to this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
Write between 200 and 300 words.
Electric cars are new concept and invention in the world of automobile industry. Eventually, electric cars will solve all our transport and environmental issues and it has several advantages as well as disadvantages. This essay will discuss both side of points like it's environment and pocket friendly and not good for family trip due to size and consume more electricity which is not free at all.
Firstly, Electric cars are really pocket friendly as they don't require gas or fuel and they are fully charged by electricity so you don't need run for fuel again and again. They are really environment friendly because of no carbon dioxide emissions so no air pollution, they don't do any noise thus no noise pollution. For example: Many countries government offer great incentives to consumer who invest in electric cars to support and encourage going green program.
Secondly, though electric cars are on fully dependent on electricity but electricity is not free at all, they consume a large of amount of electricity in 4-6 hours to get fully charged which effect the electricity supply. Electric cars present in market are quite small only two seated so entire family can't go together on trip in one car even they are limited by range and speed. For instance: We use electric car only under 50-100 miles as it needs to charge again.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds the view that there are several factors those can't be neglected while investing into electric car. Despite of it, electric car will helpful to save our precious environment and resolve the transportation problem as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...cars are really pocket friendly as they dont require gas or fuel and they are fully ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...are fully charged by electricity so you dont need run for fuel again and again. They...
^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ide emissions so no air pollution, they dont do any noise thus no noise pollution. F...
^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...s no noise pollution. For example: Many countries government offer great incentives to co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... small only two seated so entire family cant go together on trip in one car even the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ew that there are several factors those cant be neglected while investing into elect...
^^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lve the transportation problem as well.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, really, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04868913858 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69900540336 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4172395875 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.545454545 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 7.25397266985 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310052513751 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141631361239 0.0925447433944 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869014062775 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213895789021 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827754215207 0.0609392437508 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.