Experience is more effective and useful than books and formal education. To what extent do you agree with this opinion?
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day reveals importance of experience based learning has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussions, People have always intrigues to analyse and explain usefulness of experience based learning as compared to formal education from books. Regarding this I would say experience learning is more fruit worthy as compared to formal education through books.
One compelling argument in favour of my stance on this issue has to do with the fact that getting knowledge practically has a no way comparison with formal learning. This is because, through experience individuals has observational knowledge, as he has worked with his own hands. As a result, individual gets a never forgetting visualization of a certain experiment, which cannot be gained through practical knowledge.
Looking back to the introduction, one could also argue that, formal education provides individual with only theoretical knowledge of an particular subject. Due to this, individuals are lacking in skills which hampers their technical ability. Also, companies during hiring process always opt for experience based employee for their required company. As a case in point, automobile company, Honda, when hiring employees never goes for candidate's qualification, rather they check their their basic experimental knowledge.
Hence based on arguments above, we can conclude that experimental education not only develops technical skills but also makes secure future of an learner. Therefore,I believe that advantage of skill learning is way far more than book based learning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of a certain experiment, which cannot be gained through practical knowledge. ...
^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tain experiment, which cannot be gained through practical knowledge. Looking...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gh practical knowledge. Looking back to the introduction, one could also argu...
^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...dual with only theoretical knowledge of an particular subject. Due to this, indivi...
^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or candidates qualification, rather they check their their basic experimental kno...
^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: their
...dates qualification, rather they check their their basic experimental knowledge. Hence ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... their basic experimental knowledge. Hence based on arguments above, we can conclu...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on arguments above, we can conclude that experimental education not only develops...
^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... skills but also makes secure future of an learner. Therefore,I believe that advan...
^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...s secure future of an learner. Therefore,I believe that advantage of skill learnin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62745098039 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01115700568 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63137254902 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.405875145 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.583333333 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.33497536946 187% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186938175611 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685240164695 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565069542741 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104338466657 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418136867708 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.