Experience is more effective and useful than books and formal education. To what extent do you agree with this opinion?
With the advent of modern science and technology every individual is working on cutting edge technologies, furthermore, to survive in this sophisticated world one should constantly focus on improving knowledge. the only way to achieve this can be through books or by formal education. Some people argue that experience is more effective rather than books and formal education, primarily in my opinion books and formal education outweigh experience, to commence in this modern world thus I completely agree.
Every organization is Leveraging latest technologies for their daily productivity. As a result, every employee should be well-versed with the knowledge to operate it. Even proficiency should be gained by having formal education related to those tools. Trouble shooting of the devices can be trained using mock-up machinery, and daily session will be conducted before employees gain practical knowledge on machinery, for example, in technology forum CAT Technologies confirmed that they will be providing formal training through class room session to their newly onboarded engineers for 90 days. So, this give us the importance of being educated before working on actual production environment.
“As every coin has two sides”, some people argue that with experience on tools an individual will able to fulfill his everyday job, but there are very high chances of equipment’s being mis-handled by untrained professional causing damages which will have further hefty monetary and time lose towards their replacement. So, it is recommended that, such high technology sensitive tools should be handled with utmost care only by trained professionals only. Furthermore, a novice can make more damage to tools rather than using it for a productive reason.
In a nutshell, The knowledge gained through formal education and books has much weightage as they make an individual understand the basic of usage of tool and adhere to maintenance activities as per guidelines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...onstantly focus on improving knowledge. the only way to achieve this can be through...
^^^
Line 2, column 23, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'Leveraging the latest'.
Suggestion: Leveraging the latest
...ompletely agree. Every organization is Leveraging latest technologies for their daily productivi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, thus, well, for example, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 303.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56105610561 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02976768196 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597359735974 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.7096579868 50.4703680194 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.416666667 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203759297353 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820868367017 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924787895139 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129937996298 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112720717608 0.0609392437508 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.