Children education funding by government is that advantage or disadvantage do advantages overweigh disadvantages discuss
In recent years government is considering children education aspect, by funding their education fee, this will not only help the individual children but also for the overall country growth and this is a welcoming notion. There are many merits and demerits of this approach I will discuss both sides in the essay.
Firstly, funding a child education will help many parents who are under poverty line, Better education for young generation will in turn help country advancement and having good literacy rate, every family can be self-sustained with employment opportunities and the standard of living bar raises for people under poverty line, Many technology advancement in the area of health and science can be achieved.
When it comes to demerits funding a child education will need come cucumber some of amounts which needs to be allocated while budget planning, there are other burning issues which needs to be focused which would need financial support such as better roads for society , many critical health issues that are being faced by public and helping the homeless and supporting people who were effected by natural calamities such as tsunami or earth quakes.
In my opinion the advantages outweigh very much than disadvantages as a country really need to have an educated younger generation to make progress in various technology and health care domains.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
In recent years government is considering children educ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the amounts') or simply say ''some amounts''.
Suggestion: some of the amounts; some amounts
...child education will need come cucumber some of amounts which needs to be allocated while budge...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...support such as better roads for society , many critical health issues that are be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, really, so, while, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24545454545 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62498043937 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622727272727 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 12.6551724138 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 20.5024630542 215% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 134.322894549 50.4703680194 266% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 230.8 104.977214359 220% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.0 20.9669160288 210% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.6 7.25397266985 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161036251037 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905100495119 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622780530757 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099961736475 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621574294902 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.3 12.6369458128 200% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 26.82 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 10.9458128079 187% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.06 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.94827586207 206% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.3980295567 188% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.5123152709 200% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.