Space travel vs environmental problems and money investment
A colossal amount of money being spent on the space travel which was more debatable now has become controversial topic, in this essay I will go through various reasons in supporting each thus lead to the plausible conclusion
Space travel as became much fascinated these days many people can start exploring the other planets and this can bring much excitements in individuals huge funds are being invested to satisfy their wish. The core advantages of this travel are particularly limited to only élite sections of the society which does not bring any change in society nor in the lives of people who are living under below poverty range. In contrast the world is now at and edge of furnace facing many environmental problems which includes greenhouse effect, global warming, loss of many thick forests and lack of rains and many fertile lands are now turning in to deserts due to lack of water resources which is in turn making farmers become still poor and leading to suicidal tendencies due to numerous debts.
In my opinion government should take strict tab on such fantasy of space travel rather it can start diverting such funds to resolve at least some of the environmental issues these can being much happiness in many people for better living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ng the other planets and this can bring much excitements in individuals huge funds a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...re living under below poverty range. In contrast the world is now at and edge of furnace...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...iverting such funds to resolve at least some of the environmental issues these can being mu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, still, thus, at least, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 1207.87684729 87% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92018779343 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4819212304 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638497652582 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 379.143842365 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 12.6551724138 32% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 20.5024630542 259% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.8667513304 50.4703680194 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 262.0 104.977214359 250% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.25 20.9669160288 254% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.25 7.25397266985 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186711300378 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927377061027 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528510432618 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118934914291 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00748062686967 0.0609392437508 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.4 12.6369458128 225% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.8 10.9458128079 208% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 9.94827586207 292% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 23.2 10.3980295567 223% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 29.0 10.5123152709 276% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.