Medical technology can increase the human life expectancy. Is it a curse or blessing?
In recent era there are numerous advancements in science and technology. Paramount developments in medical technology has colossal impact on increasing human life expectancy. Many dreadful diseases like Cancer and HIV which are now under curable diseases list. Few people argue that it’s a curse whereas other group cites it as a blessing. In this essay I will do a profound analysis on both sides, however, in my opinion, I completely lean toward curse rather than blessings.
First and foremost, aspect with advent of new technologies is many chronic diseases like Arthritis, Asthma, diabetes, blood pressure and cancer are now under control and curable, even though they are at the final stage. Newer equipment usage for chemotherapy has made cancer curable up to 99%. For instance, based on the research conducted by WHO confirmed that 74 years is the minimum life expectancy among Asian countries. Furthermore, countries like Japan and Bhutan has 81 years. Diseases related to neonatal are under control in recent days due to this technological advancement.
As “Every coin has two side”, some people argue that with an increase in life expectancy there are many disadvantages namely: Frequent visits to medical centers for regular check-ups among elderly people, increase in medical expenses for diagnoses, and primary one which has major impact is senior citizen count will increase leading to reduction in workforce thus hindering nation progress. Additionally, increasing in population creates so many supplement problems like poverty, lack of basic facilities which will hinder the economic growth of the country. Furthermore, Financial burden on Insurance coverage will drastically increase leading to financial disruption in salaried employees.
In a nutshell, I can conclude with an increase in human life expectancy which leads to an additional burden on the environment and society. So, the advent of medical technology is a curse for younger generations and government.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 307.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52768729642 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94174140282 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612377850163 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.6238060932 50.4703680194 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.133333333 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286587807502 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883085710116 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119540208431 0.071462118173 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185689542543 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942545070725 0.0609392437508 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.