Medical technology can increase the human life expectancy. Is it a curse or blessing?
The internet has revolutionized our lives. it has changed the way we communicate and research. According to some people, the internet is a great communication tool but it is not a reliable source of information. I do not quite agree with this view. In my opinion, the internet is not only an excellent communication tool but also a treasure trove of information.
The internet has given us access to a vast pool of information. In fact, anyone who has access to a smart phone and an internet connection can now find information on just about any subject within a matter of seconds. this ease of finding information online has even made physical libraries redundant.
The main problem with finding information online is that we cannot always trust the source. The internet allows anyone and everyone to be a writer and a publisher. you can blog on any topic; you can post your opinions on any subjects. No one will ask you whether you are qualified to do so. As a result, some of the information that we find online is not very reliable. this, however, does not mean that all the information on the internet is erroneous.
While I admit that it is possible to find factually incorrect information on some lesser known websites, blogs and forums, the truth is that the vast majority of these unreliable sources do not make it to search results. When you do a Google search for a particular keyword, the websites that pop up are authority sites that do their research before posting information online. Take, for instance, the case of online encyclopedia wikipedia. anyone can edit it so we might think that it will contain a lot of mistakes. On the contrary, wikipedia does not contain any more errors than the celebrated encyclopedia Britannica because it has committed editors and writers who want to provide the most authentic information to their readers.
To conclude, I do not agree with the argument that the internet is not a reliable place to find information. If we only refer to authority websites and blogs we do not have to worry about the authenticity of the information we find
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... internet has revolutionized our lives. it has changed the way we communicate and ...
^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...any subject within a matter of seconds. this ease of finding information online has ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: You
...veryone to be a writer and a publisher. you can blog on any topic; you can post you...
^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ou are qualified to do so. As a result, some of the information that we find online is not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...at we find online is not very reliable. this, however, does not mean that all the in...
^^^^
Line 7, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Anyone
... case of online encyclopedia wikipedia. anyone can edit it so we might think that it w...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, second, so, then, while, for instance, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 20.9802955665 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 362.0 242.827586207 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80939226519 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 3.92707691288 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88022474399 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 379.143842365 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 9.0 1.56157635468 576% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 12.6551724138 166% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.2900881936 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9047619048 104.977214359 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2380952381 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0274213026137 0.242375264174 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00855107596254 0.0925447433944 9% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.022250949243 0.071462118173 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0161261963035 0.151781067708 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147730559697 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 12.6369458128 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.5310837438 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.