Experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books. Agree or disagree?
It is a highly debatable issue that experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to the books presently. This essay is going to provide you necessary arguments that why experience is most important and effective before jumping to conclusion.
Experience is always consider as a practical exposure to work and can only attain through the practice. There are myriad benefits of experience. To begin with the positive side, with the practical lesson one can understand the task more deeply compared to theories in book. In addition, when we do the practical work than it can be easily memorized for lasting period. Going ahead, one can solve the queries easily and effortlessly which naturally comes with practical exposure and experience.
Moreover, with the experience, one can becomes socially active and share his knowledge with the others and also can gain the knowledge from others. Furthermore, with the experience, one can also estimate the circumstances and because of that decision taking becomes smoothly and without being disruptions. To exemplify this, learning alone in an isolated condition, one can go to the library and meet new people and do the practice more of it.
To sum up with the aforementioned facts, one can conclude that, lesson learned from books are often forgotten but we never forget what we learn from practical task and experience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
... Moreover, with the experience, one can becomes socially active and share his knowledge...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arn from practical task and experience.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19282511211 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81785672374 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578475336323 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0152269121 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.272727273 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12192719349 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648498895225 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122514670201 0.071462118173 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102723134293 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136142010527 0.0609392437508 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.