Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently, a phenomenon of experimental learning than formal teaching has sparked a heated debate around the world. Proponents believe that a pragmatic approach is better and helpful in many real-life scenarios. Whereas, some people think books and formal education is essential for the overall development of the students.
This essay will highlight why an experimental learning is an effective way of learning than formal education.
To begin with, experimental learning allows people to gain working knowledge and can be beneficial in the real-life scenarios. Many areas like cooking, driving require hands-on knowledge. For instance, books cannot teach how to drive a car on road. Likewise, a chef always improves his recipes by experimenting.
On the other hand, consequences of formal education can lead to a limited knowledge of the subjects. A recent study conducted by Harvard University suggests that experimental learning takes precedence over formal learning.
In conclusion, as per the statements aforementioned, there are various compelling reasons but I believe that experience always takes a lead in learning. It is safe to assert that experimental learning should be encouraged in schools and universities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | jashan randhawa | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | gobindh Singh | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
- The University will deduct the student score for late assignments. Provide your opinions and solutions. 88
- In developing countries, tourism has disadvantages or advantages? 80
- Environmental responsibility for business and commercial organisation. Should they take owership? 80
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace local shop. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Cheating and lying are sometimes acceptable Choose whether you agree or disagree with this statement and discuss why you chose that position Support your point of view with details from your own experiences observations or reading 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to like'
Suggestion: to like
... subjects require experimental learning like cooking, driving, sports etc. The pragm...
^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be used in the real-life. For example, books cannot teach how to drive a car on...
^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to drive'.
Suggestion: to drive
...ve a car on road but if a person learns driving a car on the road, he can learn all the...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wledge is not implemented in practice. On the other hand, many subjects require...
^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, for example, history, literature etc. However, a basic understanding of the su...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, likewise, so, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36440677966 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08550232853 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614406779661 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9632335402 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.25397266985 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0901763226973 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297119559739 0.0925447433944 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031703968272 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505422082222 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309650137726 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.