Experience is the more effective way to teach, compared to the books. Agree or disagree?
It has long been a subject of discussion whether experience is more effective way to teach or books. In my opinion, the former notion has several strong elements which deserve attention. I will explain why using pertinent arguments.
My viewpoint has a myriad of arguments. The most perceptible one, to start with, lies in the fact that majority of assertions based on unbiased figures obtained from global and local sources. Not only it reveal some astonishing figures that prove the point of most beneficial way of teaching is experience, but also it encourages one to consider more details further down the track. It gives a transparent and logical reasoning to the people of today's world about this notion. For example, in Australia teacher's with experience are more effective way to communicate with students. Self-evidently, all these viewpoints stand experience in a good stead, as far as students success concerned.
Another vital facet of the argument is that, based on some real-time facts and figures. People are taking crucial decision after considering all associated merits and demerits. Besides a few shortcomings, It is up to authorities to further educate people and allow them to take sensible decisions. It is quite evident, that why many are in favor of my viewpoints.
From what has discussed above, one can conclude that benefits of experience in way of teaching are too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reveals'?
Suggestion: reveals
...m global and local sources. Not only it reveal some astonishing figures that prove the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, so, for example, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16956521739 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8906373863 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647826086957 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8809224507 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9285714286 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234104277651 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070524959225 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122960121923 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143910763814 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909869991274 0.0609392437508 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 12.6369458128 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.