experience is superior to formal method of learning.
In the cut-throat competition, there is an ongoing debate about whether absorbing information through practical is superior to formal methods or not. The substantial number of people claims that learning by experiences has tremendous benefits to mankind, while others hold a contrary viewpoint. I will scrutinize both perspectives before lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, the experience is nothing but participation in various situation. Firstly, it assists to provide better insight into concepts. Secondly, practical information is long-lasting in minds as compared to books. As a tangible example, A survey conducted at Cambridge University revealed that 80% of pupils want to perform experiments to learn lessons. Finally, the experience will not only beneficial to absorb information but also fruitful from the future prospect.
On the flip side, books are the best companion of the common masses as they begin their learning from books at the primary level of school. Moreover, textbooks ease learners to acquire information in a diverse range of areas. Apart from it, every scholar learns fundamentals of myriad subjects through paper books. Most significantly, for the accomplishment of a lucrative job aspirants needs both theoretical and practical knowledge.
To cap it all, admittedly, practical learning has numerous positive ramifications to aspirants. However, the importance of books cannot be marginalized. I firmly believe that to achieve appropriate information people should adopt both methods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... better insight into concepts. Secondly, practical information is long-lasting in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74449339207 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19550616945 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691629955947 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9247946247 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.9333333333 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1333333333 20.9669160288 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129220109891 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335858717885 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577605675995 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073166865957 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805510749023 0.0609392437508 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 53.1260098522 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.42 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.