Large Shopping Malls Are Replacing Small Shops. Your Opinion? Good Or Bad
In the contemporary era, large shopping malls popularity is accelerating rapidly as it transforms the urban lifestyle among people. Many people thinks that this trend taking away the local small shops. Admittedly, a large shopping mall has myriad benefit to mankind. However, this trend would affect the country economy too.
To commence with, a mall enables people to purchase numerous products under one roof which could save people’s time as they never need to go several small shops to buy groceries, clothes, footwear and so on. Secondly, a person can opt to products with myriad options and with affordable prices because mall purchases goods from company directly and products on fix prices, people never need to waste time for bargaining. Finally, people can spend holiday in malls as it facilitate people with cinemas and entertainment arcades as well.
On the flip side, this practice creates some critical issues such as it is liable to depletion of small shops because people are tempted to buy all things from large malls instead of small local shops. Consequently, it would lead to imbalance in country’s economy drastically as few people purchase goods from local shops. Another critical ramification of this trend that it is taking bread out of the shopkeepers mouth because they are left their only means of earning for living.
To recapitulate, large shopping malls have tremendous benefits for individuals as it saves time and money for customers. However, it could disastrous for country’s economy as it is taking away local shops. Therefore, I firmly concur with the statement that large shopping malls should never replace small shops.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls should never replace small shops.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30337078652 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72777477731 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554307116105 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0969737562 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290227055014 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119187325685 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983701733412 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200375203526 0.151781067708 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703384573578 0.0609392437508 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.