Experts feel that the design of buildings sometimes has a positive effect on people's life and work. Discuss.
In today's materialistic world, beautiful design and architecture of buildings catches the attention of people and has a
great impact on their minds.Some analysts insist that people have a positive influence of the architecture and infrastructure of some buildings. In this essay, there will be an explanation on this statement, with an even-handed
conclusion.
Many experts support the view that design of buildings affects the people's life and work positively. Innovative design
motivates people to work efficiently in organisation environment and enhance creative thinking as they feel comfortable while working in better infrastructure facilities. Moreover, people are more attracted to engage with the companies having
proper infrastructure and design. For instance, good design of building encourages the workers to work more better and, meanwhile, also increases the productivity of employees which in turn yields good profits and reputation of the organisation.
Furthermore, infrastructure plays a vital role in one's life and health also. Structures built with proper ventilation facilities,
exposure to sunlight and sufficient space, adds to the health of people. Modern building designs provides enough privacy space. As an example, bad structure and insufficient space gives birth to many diseases like allergies and so on.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that design of buildings has a positive impact on people's life and work. Further, the organisation and builders need to take initiative to build buildings with proper infrastructure by keeping people health in mind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
...and has a great impact on their minds.Some analysts insist that people have a posi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n on this statement, with an even-handed conclusion. Many experts support the ...
^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ew that design of buildings affects the peoples life and work positively. Innovative de...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and work positively. Innovative design motivates people to work efficiently in ...
^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...building encourages the workers to work more better and, meanwhile, also increases the prod...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 51, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e, infrastructure plays a vital role in ones life and health also. Structures built ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 72, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ys a vital role in ones life and health also. Structures built with proper ventilati...
^^^^
Line 10, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... example, bad structure and insufficient space gives birth to many diseases like ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.5418719212 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87966804979 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25826820606 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609958506224 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1604581214 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.083333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.12807881773 194% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329843700561 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123774398483 0.0925447433944 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108231384558 0.071462118173 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153417650182 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108017217804 0.0609392437508 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.