Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
State your opinion and support it with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
Rewarding the hard working employees is an good practice to motivate and inspire them. Some people think that giving extra money to workers for their extra contribution has positive impact on their working, while others insist that it may negatively affect few of them.
To begin with,some people argue that employees who put extra efforts in their works must be rewarded accordingly. It may be through the oral motivation or by paying them the monetary incentives. Such practice of employers motivate the workers and ultimately affect their productivity and efficiency.
Some analysts argue that rewarding the workers with extra money sometimes adversely affect the other workers who are not much efficient. They might be get discouraged and decrease their dedication toward the work, although they try to do their best.
There are various other ways to reward and motivate the employees to work hard. Management can provide them facilities, bonus and allowances. They can be motivated orally and by appreciating in front of others.
According to the above arguments, I argue that all the employees must be considered equally regardless of their potential and efficiency. All must be rewarded according to their workings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...Rewarding the hard working employees is an good practice to motivate and inspire t...
^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , some
...y affect few of them. To begin with,some people argue that employees who put ext...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ewarded according to their workings.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, may, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 1207.87684729 87% => OK
No of words: 193.0 242.827586207 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43005181347 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.92707691288 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76517968502 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 139.433497537 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585492227979 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 379.143842365 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3970198719 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0833333333 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 7.25397266985 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236543705287 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895605905297 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748331925835 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14109569295 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101759453436 0.0609392437508 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.