Extreme sports (Dangerous activities) like skiing, bungee jumping, rafting, diving should be banned. Agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of banning extreme sports and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of disagreeing dangerous activities are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that prohibited hazardous activities can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, banning dangerous sports can provide society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of extreme activities, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of rafting and diving. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of safe sports are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, banned dangerous sports can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of rigorous activities are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient activities. Hence, predicted outcomes of skiing and bungee jumping are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of banning extreme sports far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of dangerous activities prove the significance of harmful activities, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82589285714 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20153410592 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6909818736 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.636363636 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294647369294 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918551793223 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469187373801 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156210352895 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190274586417 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.