Government should allocate sources prior to the technology research, do you agree or disagree? Give your own experience and examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of dedicating sources for technological research before carring out it by governments and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this issue is beneficial as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponent views. I am inclined to believe that this idea can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, the idea of providing facilities and resources before doing research for researchers by governments provides the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of devoiding waste. From my own experience, when I was a pupil university, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these advantages. Firstly, the easy access to sources provides the research conducting easy and it leads avoiding extra time and money. Furthermore, researchers can enhance their concentration on the process of analyzing and researching by accessible sources which are provided by governments in advance.
In addition, the other merit of providing all sources and materials for conducting and researching by governments before starting the process of researching for researchers or faculties is accelerating the process. Conductors can spend all their time and efforts to consulting, analyzing, processing, theorizing and undertaking the details and do not need allocate their energy to provide the infrustructares.
In conclusion, while there are several reasons for allocating resources which are need for research prior the act of researching by governments, some of the nations do not put this issue on their priorities and I profoundly believe that the merits are far more outweigh their demerits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to allocate'?
Suggestion: to allocate
...undertaking the details and do not need allocate their energy to provide the infrustruct...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... the act of researching by governments, some of the nations do not put this issue on their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63059701493 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25360082923 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578358208955 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3210483135 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.9 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207952535247 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834715498285 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508977106895 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124777702855 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346186496633 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.