In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?

Essay topics:

In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?

Recently, the phenomenon of utilizing credit cards instead of cash and its corresponding imoacts has sparked a heated debate among the populations. Although this issue is beneficial as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponent views. Iam inclined to believe that it can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.

From a social standpoint, there are several reasons why using credit cards is advantageous in comparison of cash. These benefits are rooted in the fact of development. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these advantages. Firstly, due to less using of money, the governments produce a less amount of money annually and waste has been diminished in this system. Hence, they can enhance the efficeincy and productivity. Furthermore, credit cards are more secure than carring money. Thus, the rate of crime has been declined. Moreover, the way of using credit cards is quite easy and dwellers' faults in accounting their money will be decreased.

On the one hand, there is no doubt that the idea of cashless nation and declining the use of cash has some opponents. They asserted that the system of supporting the credit cards may be hacked by hackers and it might lead to some difficulties. In addition, the process of applying the new card, changing them due to their expaier time and receiving their usernames and passwords is dull and need to spend time.

In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of replacing the credit cards with cash are far more outweigh their drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14134275618 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86542155053 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4569847676 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163853615083 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489526721241 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046827376571 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864264051034 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311725630778 0.0609392437508 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.