The government should reduce its investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?
The government or public sector should emphasize STEMS instead of promoting art, music, and painting. Some people argue that if the government spend money in art and music it just wastes of money and time, others have a counter-argument and they say arts and music help nurture pupil from the base and boost their culture and historical knowledge. This essay agrees that we should not dump our useful money in painting and music like things. Firstly, this essay will discuss how it is a waste of spending money and secondly, a number of the drawback of music and culture.
To begin with, music and arts do not help the pupil to get ready for future challenges. Moreover, it has been observed that children who get influenced by art and music never had a very good career. For instance, there is a survey in India and it has been seen that student those where learning music and arts percentage of success is very less. Therefore, the government should cut its major investments to promote it.
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that numerous drawbacks like children are not ready to take opportunities for the upcoming technologies. Moreover, the world becomes a competitive place and if someone will learn painting and arts that a particular nation will remain behind with others. For instance, the United States spends more of its education budget on technology and science to flourish it. Hence, the future of the nation belongs to science and technology and not music.
To sum up, the government should slash their investment in art and culture and focus more on science and technology to make their nation deprive of future opportunities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to paint'.
Suggestion: to paint
...etitive place and if someone will learn painting and arts that a particular nation will ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 8.36945812808 275% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97864768683 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65980371332 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548042704626 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3089329855 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.615384615 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244536827217 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966574191764 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905137693965 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141109569285 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555659813333 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.