Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?
Arts, music, and paintings play an important role in building the image of a country both nationally and internationally. While some people believe that the money spent on these areas should be redirected to education and health but investing in arts and music is as important as other sectors of economy and development.
There is a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. The most vital of those is that arts play an important role in the development of a country as it creates job opportunities and brings an influx of revenue to the local industry which benefits the people. For example, when the artists, musicians, and painters perform in global contests it helps improve the image of the country on a global scale. The presented traditions and culture of the country attracts visitors and investments which help boosts the economy.
Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that music, arts, and paintings offer a platform for the people for freedom of expression and feelings which is a basic right of all citizens and this sector also needs to be invested in together with health and education. For example, the Australian government in their last budget increased the amount of money allocated for the arts industry which in results increased the artistic sense of the people by 50 percent. Hence it is clear why many people are in favor of spending a hefty amount of money in the arts.
In the view of the arguments above, one can conclude that music, arts, and paintings are important pillars of the economy of a country and deserve a major allocation in the budget.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...d the amount of money allocated for the arts industry which in results increased the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ased the artistic sense of the people by 50 percent. Hence it is clear why many p...
^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...tic sense of the people by 50 percent. Hence it is clear why many people are in favo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86029411765 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67893390199 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5087388541 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.2 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150944441901 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562309150935 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416855745953 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937685616229 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487963059188 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.1260098522 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.9458128079 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.