In recent years, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see the government investing astronomical money for the development of fine arts including painting and music across the world, be it an affluent or impoverished nation. In this essay, I will elaborate the government should foster the art to enhance aesthetic of the people.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. At first, the most conspicuous one is that these various forms of art are instrumental for the growth of a nation, therefore it needs government support to survive and thrive in the country. Not only can music and paint deeply ingrain unique characteristics which are immensely in the life, but it can also contribute a great deal to shine in these fields nationally as well as internationally. Hence, needless to say, all these merits will keep the country in a preponderant position, as far as overall development is concerned.
To embark this, another pivotal facet of the argument is that music and painting are the two varied medium of expressing the emotions and this sector deserve the investment to acquire the desired development. Besides, the government is responsible for providing citizens liberty to adopt any form of the art to thrive. For example, Australian government invested 30 percent budget to enrich the art in the country, and as a result, improvement in people artistic sense increased 50 percent. Hence, it hardly needs to mention that the dedication of the government support is instrumental and will have a far-reaching impact on the people.
To recapitulate from the arguments aforementioned, one can conclude that the upsides of infusing in the art field are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07342657343 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00972594948 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6692327336 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.909090909 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132194130427 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479065384221 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376498925473 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769141744844 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598315954622 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.