Governments and international organizations are facing global problems. Provide solutions.
Recently, the phenomenon of global concerns and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of improved countries is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that national issues can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, solving international problems can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of combating climate change, as well as global warming, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of wealthy organizations. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both universal companies and global village apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, universal issues might increase the consequences of deforestation. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the population growth would relate to this reality that the demerits of greenhouse gas emission pertain to under-developed countries. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of online networks is correlated negatively with the globalization. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the industrialization.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a developed government far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of eco-friendly industries prove the significance of polluted cities, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
- What roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change? 88
- Whether experimental learning/practical learning can work well in formal education/traditional teaching, agree or disagree? 85
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 100
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life/family/leisure and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 85
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8093385214 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46102333036 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673151750973 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9217329328 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0819397594204 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0234547324632 0.0925447433944 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371824785502 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0409568932081 0.151781067708 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376547680656 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.31 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.