Homeschooling is better when compared to the traditional schooling methods agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Homeschooling is better when compared to the traditional schooling methods—agree or disagree?

In recent times, the phenomenon of homeschooling and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate around the world. Although contested by many that traditional schooling could be highly beneficial, such issue is regarded as both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. However, I am inclined to believe that the traditional method of schooling is a plus, and I will explain my point by discussing both sides of the argument.

At the outset and from a general standpoint, homeschooling can have a plethora of advantages for a student such as personalized coaching and a dedicated teacher which could lead to significant academic success. To illustrate, according to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that students who are homeschooled had excellent knowledge of every subject. Thus, the benefits ramification of both expert level knowledge and a bright future can be apparently seen.

Within the realm of schooling, traditional schooling has its own myriad benefits such as learning by competition with other students, increased confidence and better communication. For example, research conducted by a prestigious university has asserted that students in traditional schools have a significant amount of success in their whole life. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.

To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the traditional method of schooling far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of traditional schools prove the significance of confidence and success among students but also highlights the better ways of teaching kids

Votes
Average: 9.4 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...periment which discovered that students who are homeschooled had excellent knowledge of...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'benefits'' or 'benefit's'?
Suggestion: benefits'; benefit's
...t knowledge of every subject. Thus, the benefits ramification of both expert level knowl...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63468634686 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34682481863 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59778597786 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7351677825 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.818181818 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233823663557 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810198018299 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523443411662 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141447445552 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499887955584 0.0609392437508 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.