The idea of space travel is fantastic these days and scientists are very fascinated towards it. However, there are many environmental problems in our planet that we should resolve first before considering space travel that would cost a significant sum. What is your opinion?
Many people feel that the concept of traveling in space nowadays is a wonderful experience. Yet, there are numerous ecological predicaments that the Earth should be prioritizing before any other expenditures. In my point of view, it is true that one should be focusing more on the the solutions to alleviate problems on the environment because this needs more attention and allocated funds. This essay will discuss my justifications for the stated reasons.
To begin with, one of the fascinating tourist attraction in the present era is to visit the outer space. However, this activity entails tremendous cost which can be a burden on the state's budget. To illustrate, about 10 billion were allocated in US for the construction of spacecraft intended to promote space tourism but later did not flourished due to some technical problems. Hence, even though, space travel provides pleasure to many, it must still be taken aside to concentrate on the more resolving adversities of flora and fauna.
Moreover, degradation of natural resources is a vast issue to face. It requires larger amount of funding to make every tiny solution feasible and effective. For example, research works needs expensive equipment and facilities to find alternative renewable energy that would help reduce global emissions. Thus, exploring the space by ordinary persons is a waste of money that would be more better to utilize for environment solution.
To recapitulate, the era of advance world today which include space traveling should not be given more fund allocation and must be concentrating more on the expenses for the rehabilitation of ecosystem. Indeed, this is a more viable approach to lead the entire human race a better future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...rue that one should be focusing more on the the solutions to alleviate problems on the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...rue that one should be focusing more on the the solutions to alleviate problems on the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'flourish'
Suggestion: flourish
...promote space tourism but later did not flourished due to some technical problems. Hence, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate on the more resolving adversities of flora and fauna. Moreover, degradatio...
^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...rsons is a waste of money that would be more better to utilize for environment solution. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, for example, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23826714801 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93458951317 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631768953069 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5325939348 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.642857143 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159089467622 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526152310845 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482636633616 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956143445191 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359709437583 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.