Recently, the phenomenon of space travel for the public and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of resolving environmental problems could be highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly booth constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that looking at this issue closely could be a plus, and I will explain that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, expanding our knowledge about outer space can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that preserving fuel, as well as new sources of energy, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered political decisions. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both green planet and scientific discoveries apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the environment, saving the Earth from endless garbages might increase the consequences of general contentment. Moreover, fundamental aspects of space missions relate to this reality that the demerits of living in other planets pertain to desirable prosperity. As a tangible example, some scientific research was undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of spending money is correlated negatively with the governmental funds. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a hard choice.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of caring about environmental issues instead of space travel far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of this phenomenon prove the significance of future plans, but also pinpoint energy implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61172161172 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17963487782 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67032967033 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1707153739 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151548881477 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462798760128 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484707326311 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841761700342 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351197380112 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.