The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Agree or Disagree?
Few individuals believe that the illiteracy rate in this millennium are pointing out to those who cannot simply read and write, but others feel that these are rather the people who cannot be able to grasp, reject and reprocess information they have. I completely support the foregoing argument because learning must be continuous and one should deepen further his knowledge on various subjects. This essay will discuss my justifications for the stated reasons.
To begin with, acquiring knowledge in the present time must be simultaneous. In a competitive environment, one should showcase his talents and skills to overcome others. One way to do it is to be open and willing to absorb whatever information may come on his way. To illustrate, successful individuals are continuously obtaining knowledge from different sources around the globe just to fill-in their curiosity and thirst for learning.
Moreover, it has been proven that people of today’s era already know the basics skills of life. For this reason, others are claiming that they know enough, thus learning becomes stagnant for them. Furthermore, they have assumed that wisdom is easily acquired without requiring any effort that is why they cannot be able to improve their knowledge on many aspects of the universe.
To recapitulate, the illiteracy can be solved among human beings by acceptance of learning and to augment further the information one has already obtained in the past. Perhaps, it would greatly benefit the bearer of the wisdom for a lifetime.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82784983581 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616326530612 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8142380994 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.916666667 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189699813249 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548543399309 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800044161247 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109836544537 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095686737598 0.0609392437508 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.