The illiterates of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Agree or Disagree?
Recently, a phenomenon of illiterates has sparked an ongoing debate, which inevitably leads to a moot question, what terms best describe uneducated? Where some tend to believe that illiterates will not be those who cannot read or write but those who does not understand things or their meaning, whereas many hold a contrary view. In this essay the topic will be discussed with related examples.
From the social standpoint, newer technological improvement has provided a noticeable effect in the society, which are rooted in the fact that different learning and style are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an experiment which discovered 80 percent of people are using technologies such as computer, machines, mobile phones and many more to bring change in today's world. Thus, beneficial ramification of these science inventions phenomenon can be seen.
Within the realm of illiterates, some hold an opposing view and tend to believe that for better job employment one must have great theoretical knowledge. Moreover, a fundamental aspects of learning relate to this reality that demerits of good education pertain lack of job opportunity. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by some prestigious university has asserted that the downside of learning correlate negatively with innovations. Hence, it can be correct to presume the preconceived notion of this topic.
To conclude, there are several compelling arguments on both the side, I profoundly believe that people with knowledge about the world and its advancement are considered illiterate. Not only in an personal level but also globally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...rstand things or their meaning, whereas many hold a contrary view. In this essay the topi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 179, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'aspect'?
Suggestion: aspect
...ical knowledge. Moreover, a fundamental aspects of learning relate to this reality that...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 199, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to relate'
Suggestion: to relate
...over, a fundamental aspects of learning relate to this reality that demerits of good e...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 417, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to correlate'
Suggestion: to correlate
... asserted that the downside of learning correlate negatively with innovations. Hence, it ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 194, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... are considered illiterate. Not only in an personal level but also globally.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46946564885 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05604134957 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675572519084 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5327805111 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.416666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185298709311 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557185914774 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111341016521 0.071462118173 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993672505407 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134344437433 0.0609392437508 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.