Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of academic education and its corresponding impact has sparked an ongoing debate which inevitably leads to a moot question, which more of training more effective? Whereas some believe that inspiration and more practice is a must however many hold its opposite view that physical training in classroom is helpful. In this essay both the topics will be discussed with related examples.
From the social standpoint, youths great sense of self learning and motivation can offer a noticeable effect in the society which are rooted in the fact that deep understanding of subject’s structure and mind thinking are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student I performed an experiment which discovered that students are more perfectly oriented , focused in their goals, enthusiastic to meet best marks and many other through extra inspiration and practices. Thus beneficial ramification of learning effectively can be seen.
Within the realm of institutions, students are more involved into passing time in school or colleges and not having productive learning. Moreover fundamental aspects of learning in classroom can be helpful for one to learn easily but one also fear the competition with others, which pertains to failure in learning. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by some prestigious university asserted that in classroom students mostly bunk class and after school hour take help from motivational speakers and trainers. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of classroom as a wrong concept for educating can be seen.
To conclude, there is several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that advantages of self learning and practice far outweighs institutional study. I believe self practice not only help to be perfect but also allow to be confident.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...ion and more practice is a must however many hold its opposite view that physical trainin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hat students are more perfectly oriented , focused in their goals, enthusiastic to...
^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...hrough extra inspiration and practices. Thus beneficial ramification of learning eff...
^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ges and not having productive learning. Moreover fundamental aspects of learning in clas...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46416382253 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05662731152 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627986348123 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0389540064 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.416666667 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114579511842 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432790064771 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272402371119 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0661218907923 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211379091042 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.