The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement with some examples.
The need for literacy in today's contemporary world has been shaped by several factors. In today's modern era, the definition of literacy from reading and writing has been swerved towards the process of learning, unlearning, and relearning and those who would not be able to do these three things would be considered illiterate. This essay will elaborate further by providing some examples that why individuals who would not be able to learn, unlearn, and relearn would be considered uneducated in this 21st century.
To begin with, today the contemporary world is shaping on a very fast pace and so the definition of literacy as well. In other words, with the advancement of technology the requisites for jobs are changing at a rapid pace which require the people to be flexible enough to learn and relearn new things and also unlearn the things which is no more in current use. This way they can suit to the new jobs and would be considered literate more than just being capable enough to read and write.
On the contrary, how advance the world would become in any context, the definition of literacy which consists of reading and writing would not change. The process of learning, unlearning, and relearning is also associated with the reading and writing so, the individuals who cannot read and write will not be able to learn, unlearn and relearn anything and would be considered uneducated. Through this way we can say that reading and writing in any century will come under the literacy concept only.
This essay discussed how learning, unlearning, and relearning are imperative in today's world with changing needs, however, reading and writing would always be a part of literacy. In my view, the individuals who can indeed learn, unlearn, and relearn anything would be considered literate in this century than just being able to read and write.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, well, in my view, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 6.10837438424 295% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 8.36945812808 239% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 311.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9807073955 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59665763359 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443729903537 0.580463131201 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8032368154 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.818181818 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2727272727 20.9669160288 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 2.91625615764 274% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347136053525 0.242375264174 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147105619595 0.0925447433944 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942035279852 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239676512276 0.151781067708 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522330442434 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.1260098522 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.32886699507 90% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.