Gerontologists, people who study the process of ageing, are getting closer to finding a way to increase the human lifespan significantly. They claim that within the next few decades humans may be able to live for 500 years or more. Would living for 500 years have positive or negative impacts on the world?
Support your response with details from your own experience.
Finding a 'fountain of youth' has been a dream for many storybook characters. Now gerontologists are very close to converting this dream into reality by expanding the lifespan of human beings up to 500 years or more. This essay will discuss how living an extraordinary long life would have more negative repercussions than the positive ones.
Some individuals hold the unrealistic desire to live an extraordinary long life. For them the work of gerontologists on expanding lifespan can be proved as an elixir to them. However, how far such idea will be effective is unclear and it will not be in the favor of mankind in any respect.
In contrast, our planet have limited natural resources with large growing population. If in the future people will live so long and if the birthrate will also keep on accelerating, it would become a massive problem for the human society to survive. For instance, the growing population will of course need resources for their existence and that will be insufficient because of the people living long life. Hence, living for 500 years or more will surely have a negative impact on humankind.
This essay discussed how living an extraordinary long life would have more negative impacts in terms of limited resources than positive ones. In my opinion, I strongly believe that living a life 500 years or more is completely a devastating idea which is not in favor of our planet and society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not in favor of our planet and society.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, for instance, in contrast, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92531120332 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82715460388 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535269709544 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1822599138 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9166666667 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257252223627 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105120307454 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613180263359 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167413454857 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504867482832 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.