Poverty is a major issue world wide. Many charities exist to help collect monetary donations. Who should decide what the donations are spent on? The people in need or the charitable organisations?
Support your point of view with details from your own experiences.
Poverty is existing and growing everywhere in the world. There do exist certain charity organizations to help. However, the question is that on what the money should be spent, should be decided by either needy people or by charitable organizations. This essay will discuss the reasons why it should be decided by the people in need where the donations should be spent.
The poor people who are living in deprivation of various things needed for their survival, know their requirements in a more better way. So, on what items the monetary charities should be spent, should be taken care by the needy people only. For instance, if they have the requisite for food and clothes, then the money will be better spent on these items only. In short, the money would be spent on right thing only if it would be decided by the people in need.
Furthermore, if the money will be spent by charitable houses according to their wish then might be it will not get spend on the useful requisites. Moreover, it also doesn't give full assurance that whether money have been spent also or not or whether it get utilized for some wrong deed. An individual working in such organizations, for example, may undertake high amount of money due to his greed for wealth or may give very small amount to the poor people. Thus, always only the people who are in need should decide where it should be spent.
This essay discussed how money will be spent on the appropriate thing if it will be utilized by the needy people. In my opinion, the wealth should always be spent by the people who are in need not by the charitable organizations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... survival, know their requirements in a more better way. So, on what items the monetary cha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he useful requisites. Moreover, it also doesnt give full assurance that whether money ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in short, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.5418719212 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 6.10837438424 393% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66083916084 5.00649968141 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49188864568 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465034965035 0.580463131201 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7683740824 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2142857143 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194770880772 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100184982203 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693766004001 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15020901588 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666082529482 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.1260098522 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.5310837438 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.32886699507 85% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 55.0591133005 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.