The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or Disagree? Argumentative / persuasive/ opinionated type essay.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative effects on society due to next century learning patterns. While it is possible to claim that the next generation will learn autopilot subjects, my point of view that the core subjects cannot replace by the automated subjects. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analyzing different sides of the argument to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad factors depend on the core subject self-learning such as subject integrity, confidentiality, availability, brain function improvements, and child development. For example, in 21st century there should be schools and learning curves as in today. Therefore, it is taken into account that the core subject knowledge cannot be replaced by any other action.
On the other hand, those who believed the other side of the argument have a different point of view and say reading and writing will replace for a illiterate person. For instance, in next century robot machines will work as the learning processes with direct connections through the human brain. Therefore, it is considered that the next generation of education will depend on the mobiles and computer chips; therefore, illiterate levels will be depended on the memory chip power of human being.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that the human brain is unique item, and it cannot replace. In nutshell, it is believed that the governments and professionals should take cognitive actions to protect human brain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ay reading and writing will replace for a illiterate person. For instance, in nex...
^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...nes will work as the learning processes with direct connections through the human br...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82743417253 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1679236097 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.545454545 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231016260858 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799355465645 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570249560427 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117714018712 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619341462035 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.