With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities
should only procure digital materials rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages
and disadvantages of this position and give your own point of view.
Recently, the phenomenon of diminishing the role of libraries by enhancing the online materials and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate among the populations. Although this idea is benficial as it regarded by the substantail number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that this subject is not true as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several reasons why developing technology and online information leads to omitting the role of libraries in societies. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these reasons. Firstly, the Internet provides easy access a massive amount of information and the process of searching or even exploring data has become faster and easier, and pupils or faculties do not need to go to the libraries and find out their needs. Furthermore, every person can connent to the Internet every time and every where that they are though libraries have time limitation to visit.
On the other hand, there is no doubt, the idea of the eficacy of the availability of online materials on the decreasing the role of libaries has some opponents. These dwellers asserted that libraries have several targets and they still have the pivotal roles in nations. According to recent research undertaken by a prestigious university, settlers have different tendencies to go to the libraries. Namely, these places are the popular place for studying and having appropriate time for enhancing the concentrations. Moreover, an array of citizens much prefer reading books and articles than searching them online.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides I profoundly believe that the libraries still play paramount roles in societies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
... connent to the Internet every time and every where that they are though libraries have tim...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40338983051 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99275386503 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7136872308 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.615384615 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13591389182 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448034620496 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287694439124 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796035565726 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0108255815014 0.0609392437508 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.