The information revolution has changed the way of mass communication and had some negative effects on individual lives as well on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, mass communication has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether information revolution has changed the way of mass communication or not?”. It is a widely held view that modern technology in the field of information is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that mass communication plays a vital role in the information revolution. Therefore, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that people are able to make a video connection across the countries in the fields of education, business, and telecommunication. Secondly, surgeons can operate surgery remotely without having a physical presence in hospitals. In addition to this information, a group of scientists, working at a prestigious university conducted cellphone and GPS tracker enable people to go home safety even at night. Also, booking the ticket can be carried out online and we can aware of the latest news immediately from TV with details.
However, undoubtedly information revolution in mass communication provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that some technological devices, such as the Internet have made the communities more sedentary and people have become introvert than the past. Moreover, new communication has made numerous crime, including, cybercrime, abusing juveniles, and hackers are able to access private information illegally.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that mass communication in the field of information must be taken into consideration to promote people’s lifestyle. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...Nowadays, mass communication has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 5.75862068966 417% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56849315068 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29428558385 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633561643836 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.274952367 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.076923077 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187637540974 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614775610456 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706534799187 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116194801911 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475630609508 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.