Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not?
Nowadays, following actors or sportsperson as a role model has become popular among the youngsters all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether well-known celebrities can be an appropriate role model for the juveniles or not?”. It is a widely held view that being a glamorous film or sports star is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that considering a famous film or sports star as a role model plays a vital role in youngster’s life. To put into consideration, I express why I do not support this idea. First and foremost is that the juveniles will neglect their education and they might be failed in their exams, and subsequently they will miss all the job opportunities that they could have had. Secondly, it can be argued that the majority of film or sports stars are bolded just for their fashion clothes or the unpleasant patterns of behavior that causes the juveniles spend a large amount of money to imitate the patterns. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that behavioral corruption and addiction to alcohol has excessively prevailed among them that cause damaging consequence to the young people.
However, there is no doubt that following accomplished stars as a role model provides people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that youth will be able to continue their activities in art and sport and bring the popularity for themselves and country.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that following glamorous film stars as a role model might bring illegal social implications. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, in addition, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07540983607 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95913945523 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6346986068 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.727272727 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 20.9669160288 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312272600587 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119233968082 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950456804448 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188856180094 0.151781067708 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250401537471 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.94827586207 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.