internet will soon replace books .do you agree or disagree?
Recently the phenomenon of internet to replace books has sparked a heated debate. Some people argue that internet will take place books, while others assert that books cannot be replaced by internet. In my opinion, Internet will overtake books as every piece of information are available online. This essay will discuss despite the significant downsides, online information are chosen, and thus will lead to logical conclusion.
To begin with, due to the increase in the development of the latest gadgets yearly, humans can use internet everywhere. Individuals can browse all data they need with just a click of a button. As a tangible example, everyone have mobile phones and can search for the required information all of a sudden or can even download Electronic format books from internet. Moreover, digital format is way better than paper format as it is environmental-friendly.
On the darker side, critics argue that even though full information are available online, paper format is more logical. There are certain books which are not still available online. To cite an example, a study shows that old research books are not still available in the internet. Probing further, people will be more lethargic and can even affect the eye-sight by focusing more time on screens. Hence, books are always better.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that internet has a prominent role as it has the information, but the drawbacks cannot be hidden.
- internet will soon replace books .do you agree or disagree? 75
- more information is available online, so library books are useless.agree or disagree? 72
- In today’s world, different governments and international organisations are confronting many problems to deal with. What is the most pressing problem among them? How can it be taken care of? 77
- MAR19PTE Essays with Solution.Pros and Cons of extreme/adventure sports. ORDangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not.Intro:It is irrefutable to say that, 11
- as cities are expanding, some people claim governments should look forward to creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24691358025 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87784106789 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600823045267 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5897845799 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0714285714 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3571428571 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233848767361 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875483125594 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762161979667 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132658066444 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108671146051 0.0609392437508 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.