Is it equality important for school children and university student to participate in extra-curricular activities.
Recently, the phenomenon of the amount of importance of participating in extra-curricular progrms for school or university pupils and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this idea is beneficial for both these groups as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponent views. I am inclined to believe that this issue can be plus for university students as it could be develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, the idea of determining the significance of attending in extra educational activities for school or college students provides the society with the noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of priorities in modern education. From my own experience, when I was a pupil university, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these details. Firstly, school students with regard to their ages need to be influenced by theaoretical issues to comprehend the lessons. Furthermore, these group of pupils have not specific targets in participating in these extra modules and the their time might be waste.
On the one hand, there is no doubt some opponents asserted that the university pupils have more needs to attend in extra-curricular schemes. They argue that these category of students need to encounter the practical and experimental activities which are prabably provided in these extra programs. Besides, the college pupils due to their age conditions and the short time to seek for their jobs, have particular goals and they can utilize from thses extra programs in their educational curriculum.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly blieve that the merits of put much more efforts for university students to participate in extra-curricular activities are far more outweigh the school ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...articipating in these extra modules and the their time might be waste. On the one hand...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this category' or 'these categories'?
Suggestion: this category; these categories
...tra-curricular schemes. They argue that these category of students need to encounter the pract...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45238095238 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16614783448 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568027210884 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5467532278 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.727272727 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314788246963 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122483683294 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946556716709 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207722583261 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636028091046 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.