Is it true that greatness of an individual can be decided only by those who live after him or her and not by their contemporaries?
State your opinion and support it with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
Some people believe that the good things they do can only be recognized by the surrounding individuals after they perish and not by the time they are still alive. In my perspective, it would be better if humans will appreciate the greatness of someone while he is still present because one would like to hear good words from others and due to living legacy. This essay will discuss my justifications for the stated reasons.
To begin with, the good works of any individual must be given importance and recognition while on Earth. Every person would feel glad every time they will be hearing positive feedbacks on their work. It is a rewarding feeling and must be offered to the person involved. For example, creative artworks by renowned painters like Michael Angelo should be shown great appreciation to his craft. Hence, a lot of people would agree that the best time to showcase greatness of a person is during his time.
Apart from this, the fact that numerous individuals have able to showcase good deeds must be given verbal praise at the moment of the act. Human legacy is not only a word to keep but to be exhibited to the person in possession of it. This is predominantly vital to anyone who desires to get even more motivation to his work. To illustrate, industrious employees should be provided with positive gestures every now and then to make them more productive.
To recapitulate, the greatness of people should be shown forth at the time they are still alive because it is a way to give them determination and optimistic image. Indeed, an act of admiration is vital once displayed at the right time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...on would feel glad every time they will be hearing positive feedbacks on their work. It is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...ould be provided with positive gestures every now and then to make them more productive. To re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, still, then, while, apart from, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76241134752 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65703188155 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5921317212 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9285714286 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150839521014 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519815625382 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0219424315394 0.071462118173 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091153463155 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259588595066 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 12.6369458128 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.5310837438 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.