Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience, is it a positive development?
Recently, the phenomenon of large shopping malls has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question " Is the small local shop replacement a positive development or not?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that large shopping malls development is highly beneficial. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economic standpoint, large shopping malls are bound up inextricably with local shops, which indicates they lead to both revenues and incomes. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2013 demonstrates the relationship between economic growth and financial improvements as well as an exponential increase in shopping centers. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of sales rates is correlated positively with not only a positive development but also small shops replacements.
Within the realm of customer service, without the slightest doubt, shopping malls attribute to a wide range of goods, in that it would come down to demands, consumers, and trades. A salient example of such attribution is accessible stores, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take purchases for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint goods varieties problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to needs satisfaction, prices, and even mass marketing. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of large shopping malls positive progression.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that replacing small shops with large shopping malls is a positive development. However, with the benefit of hindsight we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t a positive development or not?'. Whereas, it is a widely held view that large sh...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59595959596 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09911764055 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646464646465 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0427797897 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377364305306 0.242375264174 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117753382167 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124530766562 0.071462118173 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235983124349 0.151781067708 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0964821130843 0.0609392437508 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.