Recently, the phenomenon of law can change human behavior and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated
debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly
beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently
positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that changing human behavior can be a
plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the effect of law in changing human behavior with law can provide the society with some noticeable effects
which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are
inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university
student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus,
beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated
procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the impact of the law on human behavior might increase the consequences of critical
needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious
university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively
with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this
remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly
believe that the benefits of law can change human treatment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages
of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint
thorny issues’ potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83606557377 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21055225688 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655737704918 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0194471114 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.454545455 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.12807881773 484% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319206948633 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113048252752 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116690416048 0.071462118173 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744886198903 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129371099534 0.0609392437508 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.94 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.