Is learning of a new language at an early age beneficial for the psychological development of children? Or is it likely to cause more harm than benefit to a child’s psyche?Illustrate the two points of view, giving reasons advanced by proponents in each

Essay topics:

Is learning of a new language at an early age beneficial for the psychological development of children? Or is it likely to cause more harm than benefit to a child’s psyche?

Illustrate the two points of view, giving reasons advanced by proponents in each case. Then state your opinion with reasons and evidence.

One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world of is learning of a new language at an early age benefical for the psychological development of children. There is widespread worry that this would onlylead of myraid the concerns of is it likely to cause more harm than benefit to a child psyche the society. In my opinion, the apprehension is warranted the should be cosidertion. There is deluge of the arguments favor of my stance. The most perponderant one is that people is language at an early and the fast age benefical for the psychological development of children. Needless to say, all these benefits something good something is good when doing the concered. Another pivtol aspect of the arguments of one is that is learning of a new language at an early age benefical for the psychological development of children. Besides, the view of the people of the language at an early age psychological developmentof these caues. Hence, it is apprearent benefits why many needed the is learning of a new language at an early age benefical for the psychological development of children is it likely to cause more harm than benefit to a child psyche. In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude of the benefits many more nedeed dire to ignore.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efits many more nedeed dire to ignore.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, hence, so, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 8.36945812808 12% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 1207.87684729 86% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02351325003 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 139.433497537 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412037037037 0.580463131201 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4094817898 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48740214152 0.242375264174 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199451303864 0.0925447433944 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158878287027 0.071462118173 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.48740214152 0.151781067708 321% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.32886699507 87% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 55.0591133005 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.