Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree?
In these days, people often take a variety of viewpoints when it comes to most daily life issues. To give an illustration, while many people believe that learning a second language at an early age is conducive to children, other holds the opinion that it is not the case. This essay offers some insights in favor of the latter outlook.
There are a numerous reliable grounds that support the belief that learning foreign language at an early age does not offer any benefits to the youngsters. First and foremost, learning a foreign language at a younger age does not appear to be necessary. This is true because the child is not aware of the benefit of learning a second language and therefore, has no interest and motivation. Without being forced to learn something as abstract as language, it can be argued that the youngsters would have extra time to explore the world around them, which is more conducive.
In addition, ample evidence from a number of studies also suggests that people should not learn a foreign language unless they would use it frequently. There is no doubt that learning language is a daunting and time-consuming task and therefore, it refrains the children from taking part in outdoor activites which are more beneficial. To give an illustration, in my developing countries, parents often urge their children to learn a second language regardless of their usefulness, which occupies most of their time. As such, the child grows up lacking practical skills while forgeting the foreign langauge they learned.
In conclusion, from the above analysis, it is obvious that acquiring a language other than mother tongue at the early age does not hold any merits for children.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00352112676 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68170965122 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545774647887 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8039051586 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.416666667 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291514139652 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100839618951 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722042718357 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175203029127 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170633623458 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.