Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspects or it has adverse effects? Do you agree or disagree? Give examples from your experience.
The idea of learning a new language by the younger ones is widely debated with many academics claiming that learning a second language adds further pressure to the children and hamper their development process. However, I believe that learning a new language has now become a prerequisite in this modern world. This essay will further elaborate on both the sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are various ways how learning a secondary language bring the best in a child’s career. Firstly, it is nowadays pivotal to have some extra qualities or expertise to survive in the competitive world. Moreover, students at their early age are at their best in terms of faculties and excel in pronouncing the words, accents and catching the meaning. Hence, it is apparent how learning a second language at an early age gives an edge and make a student stand out in the crowd.
Nevertheless, there are some drawbacks which can certainly overwhelm the potential benefits of learning a new language. The most alarming one is that a child is already besieged with too many tasks in their school time. This leaves him with scanty time to focus on something new. In addition, learning a new language takes a lot of time and students will eventually get confused and lose the command of the primary language. Thus, there is no doubt that learning a new language is a daunting task for children.
To recapitulate, the impact of learning a second language is prominent for a student’s development process although it has minor drawbacks which can easily be handled by providing proper coaching to students.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, thus, in addition, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96727272727 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79719812587 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552727272727 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3139085578 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.076923077 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249763404174 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883901522242 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069730321953 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142534621894 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406073803166 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.