Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree?

In these days, people often take a variety of viewpoints when it comes to most daily life issues. To give an illustration, while many people believe that learning a second language at an early age is conducive to children, other holds the opinion that it is not the case. This essay offers some insights in favor of the latter outlook.

There are a numerous reliable grounds that support the belief that learning foreign language at an early age does not offer any benefits to the youngsters. First and foremost, learning a foreign language at a young age is unnecessary and ineffective. This is true because the child is not aware of the benefit of learning a second language and therefore, has no interest and motivation. Without being forced to learn something as abstract as language, it can be argued that the youngsters can make use of their spare time to explore the world around them, which is more conducive.

In addition, ample evidence from a number of studies also suggests that people should not learn a second language unless they practice it frequently. There is no doubt that children would tend to forget the language they learnt in class simply because they have to chance and environment to use it. As such, it turns out to be a waste of time, money and effort. Further, learning language is a daunting and time-consuming task and therefore, refrains the children from taking part in outdoor activities which are more beneficial.

In conclusion, from the above analysis, it is obvious that acquiring a language other than mother tongue at the early age does not hold any merits for children.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8768115942 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64002921448 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561594202899 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6453278692 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283405235663 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946319186952 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709556598183 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16670007447 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321677096658 0.0609392437508 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.