Learning a new language at an early stage is helpful for children. Is it positive for their future prospects or will it have some adverse effects? Do you agree or disagree?
In this competitive era, everyone prefers to possess extra skills. If a new language will be learnt at an early stage by the children, it will give them positive results in their future. Although grabbing a new language skill in early age is not an easy, but sincere efforts must be taken them to learn any new language. Therefore, I agree with this statement and feel that learning a new language is always beneficial for children.
To being with, the first advantage of learning new skills for children at an early age is that they can learn all the fundamentals at their initial phase of life. In future, they will get good employment opportunities. They may be hired by the multinational companies because of this additional skill. For example, if a Spanish child will learn English as a new language at his early life, he will be able to work in any English-speaking country in the future.
Moreover, if new languages will be acquired by children, later they can develop relations with international people as a businessman. They can do business worldwide with others. This will boost the economy at any large scale. An Indian child, for example, if knows to speak Chinese, he can do business in countries like China and Taiwan.
From the above analysis, it is evident that learning a new language skill is always beneficial for the children and has no adverse event in their life. Hence, they must learn a new language at an early age for their betterment of future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
...s always beneficial for children. To being with, the first advantage of learning n...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...mentals at their initial phase of life. In future, they will get good employment opportun...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.796875 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74216524207 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51953125 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 384.3 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7797507713 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7142857143 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402353444076 0.242375264174 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153766654396 0.0925447433944 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112773857305 0.071462118173 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284673454824 0.151781067708 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805147287392 0.0609392437508 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 61.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.