In less developed countries, are the disadvantages form tourism as great as the advantages?
The importance of tourism in less developed countries, which was always debatable, now has become more controversial. The substance influence of less developed countries’ tourism industry has sparked controversy over the potential impact on this trend for the whole society in recent years. It can be agreed that tourism brings some advantages for less developed countries, although it has drawbacks. This essay will elaborate on how tourism boosts the local economy and how tourism takes a detrimental impact on the local environment, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerable reasons that tourism is a benefit to less developed countries, but the most conspicuous stems from the fact that tourism boosts the local economy. As an illustration, research has invariably revealed that India’s personal income in 2018 has a dramatically increased four times compared with the last year after the government developing the local tourism industry. Therefore, tourism takes advantages more than disadvantages.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that tourism takes a negatively impact on less developed countries as there are innumerable reasons for that but the most salient one is that tourism brings harm to local environments. For instance, Anna’s father said during the development of China’s tourism, environmental pollution and over-exploited have become increasingly obvious. Thus, tourism bing harm to the whole society.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the positive impact of tourism in less developed countries is prominent, although environmental pollution problems should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('negatively') instead an adjective, or a noun ('impact') instead of another adjective.
... and tend to believe that tourism takes a negatively impact on less developed countries as there ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (bing) must be used with a third-person verb: 'harms'.
Suggestion: harms
...ncreasingly obvious. Thus, tourism bing harm to the whole society. In conclusion,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72200772201 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15418258614 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555984555985 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2323538903 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.727272727 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339632596164 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15621477184 0.0925447433944 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822917170749 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220082544285 0.151781067708 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768147712543 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.